L.A. Officials Had Been Hoping To Fill Vacant City Jobs. The New Plan? Eliminate Them
For more than a year, Los Angeles’ political leaders have voiced alarm over the large number of vacant positions in city government, saying the situation has seriously hampered their ability to provide services to their constituents. At one point, with the labor shortage affecting about a fifth of the city’s positions, some on the City Council began exploring the idea of providing hiring bonuses to every new employee. Now, a looming budget shortfall, one fueled in large part by new raises for public employees, could force council members to do an abrupt U-turn, slowing down hiring at many city agencies. In a seven-page report issued last week, City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo also recommended that the city prepare a plan to eliminate all of the city’s unfilled “non-critical” positions. Szabo, the city’s top financial analyst, declined to say how many vacant positions would need to be cut from the budget. He said the city’s general fund budget, which pays for basic services, currently has more than 2,100 unfilled civilian positions — both critical and non-critical. In his report, Szabo attributed the ongoing budget woes, in part, to lower-than-expected tax revenues in the city’s general fund — $158 million less than projected for the current budget year. He also pointed to increased costs from two new salary agreements: one with rank-and-file LAPD officers, the other with civilian employees represented by the Coalition of L.A City Unions.
Los Angeles Times
|